fuhrman diversified, integrated systems guaranteed to do what you need a video system to do. fieldcam
Introduction Fieldcam custom closed circuit video systems
questionnaires
Custom System Types
System Components
White Papers
video tutorial trail

 

ANALOG or DIGITAL RECORDING?

We offer  both types and we want you to clearly understand the differences before you specify or buy a system.

Lets be realistic, most analog or digital time lapse recorders, closed circuit cameras and accessories were not built for field, lab, educational, scientific, industrial or wildlife applications.  They were built for the security industry which has enormously different requirements than most of your applications.

Most digital time lapse video security systems are intended for short bursts of important data (i.e. the five minutes while a bank is being robbed) or for some few hours (i.e. while the robber is casing the bank without his mask on). The video data being stored on the digital hard drives(DHD) is immediately available to the police or security for downloading to the internet, digital storage cards, DVD's, etc.  When the event is over and the small amount of critical data is archived off of the DHD, the DHD is then placed back on line to record new video data.  At some point in the future, depending on DHD capacity, it will start to write over the data previously recorded but the small amount of security critical data has been saved.

HOW SMALL (OR LARGE) IS THE AMOUNT OF YOUR CRITICAL DATA???

With digital, even if you swap out dockable DHD's, you must do immediate and constant post processing within the time limit capacity of the DHD's you are using. To not post process would require a large number of DHD's (at roughly $300.00 per 80 gig DHD with cassette).  Even if transferred to large DHD's,  the cost can approach $1000.00 per terabyte.

GET THE PICTURE, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH TERABYTES OF DATA?

With analog recording systems, you simply eject the $3.00 tape and replace it with a new $3.00 tape.  Archiving is done and no data can be lost!  Now you can immediately review the tape or forget about it for 6 months or longer while you continue your work.
ANALOG RECORDING ADVANTAGES
No post processing required in the field/lab
Data storage is cheap ($2 - $3 /tape)
Changeout time in field is a fraction of that for a DHD
Easily display output on analog monitors
Most television repair stations can service the recorders
Sampling techniques can easily be implemented
Known compatibility with Noldus Video observer pro,
ANALOG RECORDING DISADVANTAGES
Tape storage is relatively bulky
T120 and T160 tapes are about all that are available
Variety of available recorders are decreasing because security industry doesn't need them
Systems generally require more power than digital systems
Resolution degrades when tapes are copied
Moisture condensation on recorder heads can be a problem
DIGITAL RECORDING ADVANTAGES
Various resolution levels are available to much higher levels than most analog systems
Various compression schemes are available MPEG 2 , MPEG 4, etc.
Tremendous range of storage capacities from 20 gig to many terabytes
Variety of DHD recorders are growing explosively, most are not suitable for field/lab use.
Systems generally require less power than analog systems
Moisture generally less of a problem because DHD's are sealed.
Pre-alarm recording is possible if triggered system is used (not recommended unless calibrated)
DIGITAL RECORDING DISADVANTAGES
Post processing is a virtually certain requirement for most field applications.
DHD changeout in field usually requires power down, changeout and reboot
DHD's are expensive and a poor choice for large digital storage
Transferring DHD's to DVD's is slow, expensive and painful (you have keep track of 20 -30 DVD's for each 80 gig DHD download
DHD's are relatively more fragile than tapes
Active window area alarm triggers on DHD systems are designed for human sized subjects and stable image backgrounds (a bank lobby on a Sunday afternoon) and not the field where leaves blow, trees shake,clouds pass etc. etc. etc
Which leads me to my final statement concerning all recording systems:

IF YOU LIKE TO COLLECT LOTS OF INVALID DATA, USE A TRIGGERED SYSTEM THAT HAS NOT BEEN CALIBRATED

To calibrate you must use a continuously recording video system with a valid temporal interval (time between images) so absolutely no data has been lost during the calibration period.

I invite your comments and suggestions.
Richard Fuhrman
WE HAVE BUILT OVER 650 FIELDCAM™ CUSTOM MONITORING AND INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS SINCE 1987!
FUHRMAN DIVERSIFIED, INC.,  2912 BAYPORT BLVD.,  SEABROOK, TX 77585,

PHONE:  (281) 474-1388,  FAX: (281) 474-1390, e-mail: fdi@flash.net, 

TECHNOLOGY AND TOOLS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY.COM™

 

Home | Introduction | Questionnaires | Custom System Types | System Components
White Papers | Video Tutorial Trail | Contact Us | Site Map

©Copyright 2007, Fuhrman Diversified, Inc.
FIELDCAM, FIELDCAM WCMS, FIELDCAM BASIC, FIELDCAM TLV, MDP AND BURROW PROBE
ARE TRADEMARKS OF FUHRMAN DIVERSIFIED INC.